Radley Balko and Mike Royko |
This article also appears at the Freedom Bunker.
Royko, Mike Royko of the Chicago Daily News that is. I am a fan of both men and I must admit, my regular reading of Mike Royko did not kick into high gear until the mid 1980s. However, doing some recent research for a book project, I have been reading a few Royko articles from 1972, articles that predate the birth of Radley Balko by over three years.
Royko, Mike Royko of the Chicago Daily News that is. I am a fan of both men and I must admit, my regular reading of Mike Royko did not kick into high gear until the mid 1980s. However, doing some recent research for a book project, I have been reading a few Royko articles from 1972, articles that predate the birth of Radley Balko by over three years.
I came across Balko's writing in one of his early blog posts
years ago on Reason's Hit & Run blog, where he was taking
shots at National Review's blog creator, Jonah Goldberg, over
something or other that has left my memory.
It did not take long before I was reading Balko on a regular basis, and
you cannot read Balko on a regular basis without reading a cop-shoots-dog story
or three. At Hit & Run it might be an exaggeration to say that those stories
were a daily feature, but they appeared at least weekly.
Well, before Radley was thought of, Mike Royko was on the
cop shoots dog beat in Chicago. On
January 7, 1972 the Chicago Daily News published, "The police get their
man" by Mike Royko on his page 3 column.
Sorry no link, the Daily News does not have an online archive. However, the article is available on
microfilm from the Chicago Public Library.
"The police get their man" is a column about Mr.
Robert Sheppard of Chicago's Far South Side, and his 90 pound dog Beau. Mr. Sheppard, a salesman, lived n a modest
two-story home. While he was out for
dinner, a prowler visited his home and Beau greeted him by gnawing the burglar's
leg.
The burglar fled upstairs and hid behind a door, only to be
seen by a neighbor who called the police.
While hiding behind the door, big dog a-growlin', the burglar made a call too, to his mother and
told her he was trapped by an angry dog on the second story of a stranger's
house.
Chicago's finest arrived before the trespasser's mom and
assessed the situation. They investigated
and discussed things with the neighbor who called earlier, then they rang the
doorbell, only to hear big barking, etc.
While they were debating their next move, the prowler called the police
with a story that he was hiding in the house from street toughs who had
accosted him outside.
After a while, the police entered the house, Beau identified
them as strangers, charged, and was felled by two shots from the police. A third round put Beau out of his
suffering. A faithful dog just doing his
job, gunned down in the line of duty.
The cops arrested the burglar and went on their way, leaving
Beau in the driveway, where Mr. Sheppard found it.
He could not bear to move the body and he called Chicago's
"animal removal service," who gave Mr. Sheppard the runaround, for three days and eventually "told him
off," presumably for thinking that anybody in a city office called
"animal removal" should bother to remove an animal killed by city
cops. Nobody lifted a finger to help Mr.
Sheppard until Mike Royko called about the situation.
As Royko noted in closing, it is doubtful that the crook was
going to get away, and the city could have called a team with tranquilizer darts
for the tigers that occasionally escaped from the local zoos. The situation could have been handled without
killing Beau. Yes, all this is true and
obvious in hindsight. Hell, if I were
the cop at a door with a 90 pound dog on the other side, I would want to find a
solution that avoided opening the door too.
But what about after?
I was just 10 years old when this happened, and maybe I am imagining
things. But, I am pretty darn sure that
if almost anywhere in Cook County, and Chicago for sure, if Robert Sheppard
shot a dog three times and left it in his driveway, it would not take three
days of blowing off the bureaucrats before he
was in a jail cell. Telling them off at
day three might result in a "contempt of bureaucrat" beating.
No comments:
Post a Comment