Monday, November 28, 2016
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Tuesday, August 23, 2016
Ed. I did email David Steinberg through his website while drafting the first version of this. I received no response. Also followed up with a Tweet of inquiry, no response.
This topic was featured in Episode 269 of Matt & Mattingly's Ice Cream Social, from Las Vegas, Nevada (at approx. 54:30)
|The Pinocchio Tour|
I really hope there is a reference out there that I missed, since this is such a cosmic bummer. It's like finding out Mickey Mantle corked his bat. In this case, Sammy Sosa is a better comparison.@david_steinberg there are two comedians on the complete Nixon enemies list, neither is you. https://t.co/PQWB6waCwP— Austrian Anarchy (@AustrianAnarchy) August 24, 2016
Comedian and Director David Steinberg has been falsely claiming, since at least 2002, to have been on the infamous Nixon's Enemies List. That is the slang term for two similar lists, three if you count the list of McGovern staff and contributors:
- The official name of the first list, with just 20 named is: A list of President of the United States Richard Nixon’s major political opponents compiled by Charles Colson, written by George T. Bell.
- The second is known as: The Master list of Nixon's political opponents.
- The other "second" list is: The List of McGovern Staff Members and Campaign Contributors
David Steinberg even made the claim in his 2013 documentary Quality Balls. In 2014 he got 'reporter' Marc Ambinder (Twitter) to add that he was the only comedian on the list.
-- made Richard Nixon's enemies list, becoming the only comedian to do so ("In America, anyone can become President. I think we bend over backwards to prove it."); Marc Ambinder - July 16, 2014Bill Cosby and Dick Gregory might disagree, they are literally on the list.
Steinberg is not on it. He was never on it. He is not on any version of it and never has been.
Steinberg's false claim is not even original, he is following in the hallowed footsteps of L. Ron Hubbard and the Church of Scientology. It seems that humorous sermons are not their only point of coincidence.
Steinberg claims it as a badge of honor, his greatest achievement:
Being on Nixon's enemies list. - Proust Questionnaire JUNE 2007With actual achievements in directing episodes of Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm, and Golden Girls, why bother making up something like being on the Nixon list? What is it with that damn Nixon's Enemies List that turns the cream of Hollywood into sniveling, slimy fabricators, even when they are in candid interviews?
This list, both the original and the expanded versions, have been published, and published, and published some more. Daniel Schorr read the list on the air on CBS news, and discovered his own name was on it (#17). That was in June, 1973, and the New York Times published both of the lists shortly thereafter. The lists are in the Congressional Record, that is where the news outlets got them. This was decades before Steinberg figuratively erased someone else and penciled in his own name.
In the 2002 interview, with the First Amendment Center, no less, he claimed that his (unnamed) cousin the lawyer found out for him that he was on the list. He also claimed to be number twenty on the list:
Paulson: Having never made the enemies list myself, is there a list, and do you have a number? Like, are you in the top 10? Is there a ranking?
Steinberg: Twenty, I’m sorry to say.
Paulson: With a bullet?
Steinberg: I’m in the top 20, yeah. My cousin who’s a lawyer found out for me, so yeah.
Actually, "twenty" would be Mary McGrory. If that was Steinberg's birth name, I take all of this back.
John Norris, a biographer of McGrory, has weighed in on the topic.
The Wikipedia compilations are not the only versions, they are just easy to read. There are several others like this one (both lists on the page). Unless Steinberg performed as Representative John Conyers, he is not #20 over there either. The Watertown Daily Times, and others, printed a copy of the long one via UPI (PDF), on June 28, 1973 (PNG copy below too). He does not appear anywhere on that list.Hey @david_steinberg why would u say you were #20 on Nixon's Enemies List? Mary McGrory earned that fair and square. pic.twitter.com/YHYXkrEyKi— John H Norris (@john_h_norris) August 25, 2016
Makes one wonder what his cousin the lawyer was doing in 1972, the approximate year that Steinberg placed being told that he was number twenty on the list. Just any old lawyer would not have access to that before it became evidence, in 1973, of a Watergate investigative committee.
Then, a year later the lists come out and nobody Steinberg knows comes up to him and says "That cousin of yours is full of crap, you aren't in there." Conversely, if he kept it under his hat, Steinberg did not find it suspicious that the release was made and nobody he knew slapped him on the back in congratulations?
Maybe David Steinberg just doesn't run in literate circles?
Maybe David's cousin the lawyer just made it up to make him feel good? Possibly, but ...
Even in 2002, if you were incapable of web searching, you could look it up for yourself in a library or just ask a librarian. The First Amendment Center could have easily looked it up, located at Vanderbilt University that is also the home of one of the largest (perhaps the largest) news archives in the world.
In 2002 he claimed that Tony Ulasewicz was on TV during the Watergate hearings, testifying about "dirty tricks," and two FBI agents who had followed him around on tour were sitting behind Ulasewicz. Later, that story shifted. The FBI guys, who by-the-way carry some very distinctive identification, somehow became "administration" guys, or "Nixon" guys.
In a bigger change, Steinberg's later versions of the tale replaced Ulasewicz with Donald Segretti. Before anybody theorizes that maybe Steinberg didn't really know who Segretti was, he sure sounded like he knew who he was in 1974.
|Sarasota Herald-Tribune May 10, 1974|
I haven't found any video archives of any Segretti appearance before the Watergate committee. However, I did find these clips of him talking to the press after his trial and sentencing, via the Associated Press:
Again, Steinberg told a different version of this tale to The First Amendment Center, located near the most comprehensive collection of news video outside the Library of Congress, and the 1A center took it without question.
Donald Segretti may have appeared elsewhere on television and it would be nice to see if the people "sitting behind him" (in other versions, they are "standing behind him") are the same ones as in the Ulasewicz clip. At this point, one cannot be sure that the people behind Ulasewicz are FBI, Secret Service, Nixon staffers, or Steinberg's lawyer relatives either.
In some versions, Steinberg claims to have called these guys on the phone and confronted them. In another, he claims that his buddy Sidney Aaron "Paddy" Chayefsky slammed a Nixon henchman heckler against the wall in an elevator. Later he told Joe Otterson (name at top of article) or Itay Hod (name of interviewer on video) of The Wrap that he never saw the hecklers, only heard the voices and the same voices followed him around on tour.
It would not surprise me if there are even more versions.
One would think that over a decade later, when Steinberg was preparing his autobiographical documentary, that someone would have fact-checked the easy part, the enemies list. Beyond that, it would have been nice if anybody who interviewed him had bothered to look and see if this claim was true.
Of course, I can forgive Gilbert Gottfried for not calling Steinberg on this one. Gilbert is just a very, very funny guy. Vanity Fair is a whole different story.
Now, a blast from the past from the late, great, Dick West, writer of "The Lighter Side" column:
David, why couldn't you be a good honest boy, like David Brenner or Jerry Seinfeld?
PS, since the Steinberg story of Nixon's henchmen heckling his shows keeps changing, a simple Privacy Act Request to the FBI (not Dan Rather), by Steinberg could get him all of the reports of all of the agents who attended his shows on official business. If any of that happened at all.
If that is too much trouble, Mr. Steinberg can just sign a form authorizing me, or anybody else to do it, since he the subject of those reports and is still a living person.
h/t to the delightful Jesse Walker for the Scientology link
Below, the other pages of the 'Nixon' list and cover memo, via Wikimedia. Followed by the bigger list, via Fulton History.
The longer, more developed list:
|PDF version at Fulton History|
|David Steinberg and Brian Williams|
Sunday, August 21, 2016
Friday, June 26, 2015
Saturday, April 11, 2015
"Marion Delgado" was a name the quaint folk in the Weathermen (Weatherwomen, Weatherpeople, Weather Underground) used to invoke every now and again. For example, terrorist Jeff Jones invoked the name to kick off the Days of Rage riots in Chicago, 1969:
|"Bringing the War Home" 2004|
Here is another version:
|"The War Within" 2005|
|"The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage" By Todd Gitlin|
They put Delgado in the Students for a Democratic Society newspaper, New Left Notes vol. 4, Number 29 August 29, 1969:
Without attribution or even a hint of the story's origins.
The caption reads: With a defiant smile, 5-year-old Marion Delgado shows how he placed a 25-pound concrete slab on the tracks and wrecked a passenger train.
The International Socialist, No. 14 December 1969, covered it like this on page four:
|i.s. #14, December 1969|
Possibly I am not the only person who had doubts of the authenticity of this Weather Saint, or maybe I am one of the few who paid attention, and had the time to waste in running it down. So, here be the origin of Marion Delgado, 'Revolutionary:'
|LIFE Jun 2, 1947, p, 40|
BOY WRECKS TRAIN
Express is upset and five people are injured by a childish prankFive-year-old Marion Delgado lives close to the Western Pacific’s railroad tracks in Decoto, Calif. On May 20 Marion was trying to smash a concrete slab. But it would not break. The slab weighed 25 pounds. Marion lugged it over to the tracks and bounced it on the rails, but it still would not break. Then Marion had an idea.
At 11:10 a.m. the Feather River Express boomed into Decoto at 50 mph. There was a crash. The engine jumped the rails, tore up 300 feet of track, hit a switch and turned over. The engineer and four other people were injured.
“Why did you do it, boy?” said the police to Marion. Marion shrugged, “I couldn't break that big rock by myself,” he said, “so I decided to let the train do it.” Police, unable to punish 5-year-old Marion, could only hope that parents of equally ingenious children would keep them under control.
I have no idea what happened to Marion in later years. He is about five years older than terrorist Jeff Jones, as Jones was born the same year as this prank derailment.
Billy Ayers in Fugitive Days, his novel cloaked as a memoir, could not be outdone on this one. Young Marion was transported in space and time to Italy and the late 1960s in a "hot off the AP wire" story. Also, he erased the injured engineer and passengers from the scene (p.149):
Ⓐ Steve Ⓐ
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Haven't seen anybody else writing about this, so if it is not "news" to you, my apologies for not uncovering prior work earlier.
Billy Ayers was at it again at the Miami Book Fair, November 24, 2013, talking about his experience trying to speak at the University of Wyoming in 2010. He stated repeatedly that "the tea party" tried to stop him from speaking and that they threatened to blow up the building where he would appear. Perhaps he was going for irony there. There was plenty of true wrong to go around with the administration of UW, like claiming there were threats of violence in connection to Ayers' scheduled appearance, but not bothering to contact the local police about them.
Of course, Professor Ayers never settles for the truth when he can make up a lie to go with it. For example, he speaks of a woman named "Meg" who, according to Ayers, didn't know anything about him. BTW, I will stick with Meg for the woman, since that is the only name Meghan Michelena, aka Meghan Lanker, aka Meghan Lanker-Simons has used consistently since she was charged with threatening her ex-boss with a gun in 2005.
Here she is in her own words in April, 2010:
Last September, Lanker heard from a graduate student friend that UW's Social Justice Research Center, a 2-year-old anonymously endowed institution, was planning to bring Ayers to campus in the spring to discuss education theory.
Having read Ayers' memoirs in high school, Lanker was excited at the news.
"I'm honestly interested what the man has to say about education," she said. "He's the pre-eminent expert in the field, well respected, and it's an issue that I'm very interested in. Because I think that educational reform is a key piece of keeping people out of the criminal justice system."
But many others weren't as thrilled by the news. When media reports came out about Ayers' visit, the SJRC and university administrators were bombarded with hundreds of phone calls and e-mails expressing outrage that UW would invite someone with Ayers' past to speak. Some of the calls threatened violence or cutting off funding to the university.
On March 31, SJRC director Francisco Rios withdrew the invitation for Ayers to speak, citing safety concerns.
When Lanker heard the news, she was -- in her words -- "pissed."
She contacted Ayers, who readily agreed to come to UW later in the month and even offered to cover his travel expenses himself.
For his speaking fee, Lanker hit the phones. She raised nearly $2,000 in 48 hours, all from individual Wyoming residents.
"The reason that I decided to do something about it was because I didn't know if anybody else was, and this is something that I felt passionate about," she said. "I just felt like it was completely egregious the way that (UW administrators) were handling it."
"I almost felt," she said, "like they were daring someone to do something about it."
But when she told UW Provost Myron Allen of her plans, she soon received a phone call from Susan Weidel, the school's attorney, notifying her Ayers was banned from speaking on campus. UW still hasn't given a reason for its decision.
She and Ayers sued a couple of days later.Also, there is no mention of "tea party," "teaparty," "tea" or "party" in the article. Other articles of the time are missing any tea party references too, including Professor Ayers own article in one of original Yippie Paul Krassner's favorite haunts, The Rag Blog.
I'm not sure if the tea party was mentioned before November 2013, and frankly I won't waste time looking for it. Here is Ayers in his own words about the issue:
So, it seems the only people involved in this event who got their names in the papers, who have a history of terrorizing others with firearms and/or explosives are Billy and Meg.
With her own proven, convicted history of fabricating threats, it seems odd that a man of letters like Professor Ayers would continue pretending those threats came from a group that has no history of such actions. Group used quite loosely here, since unlike the Weather Underground, one is in the tea party by their own assertions rather than approval by a Weather Bureau.
Then again, Ayers has his own proven history of fabrications. Birds of a feather.
Ⓐ Steve Ⓐ